Connect with us

Headlines

You lack jurisdiction to bring suit on Electoral Act – Supreme Court to Buhari

Published

on

You lack jurisdiction to bring suit on Electoral Act – Supreme Court to Buhari
Supreme Court in session

The Supreme Court on Friday struck out the suit challenging Section 84(12) of the Electoral Act, brought by President Muhammadu Buhari and the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF), saying the two lack jurisdiction to bring such case before it.

The apex court further described the action of the president and the AGF as an abuse of court process.

President Buhari and his Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami, who is also the AGF, had filed a suit at the Supreme Court, seeking an interpretation of the controversial clause in the amended Electoral Act 2022.

Upon assenting to the act, President Buhari asked the National Assembly to delete the controversial clause, however, the parliament declined the president’s request.

Section 84(12) of the legislation holds that, “no political appointee at any level shall be a voting delegate or be voted for at the convention or congress of any political party for the purpose of the nomination of candidates for any election.”

In their suit marked SC/CV/504/2022 and filed on April 29, 2022, President Buhari and Malami sought an order of the apex court to strike out the section of the Electoral Act, which they argue was inconsistent with the nation’s constitution.

According to the court document, the plaintiffs contend that the Section 84(12) of the Electoral (Amendment) Act, 2022 is inconsistent with the provisions of sections 42, 65, 66, 106, 107, 131, 137, 147, 151, 177, 182, 192 and 196 of the Constitution of Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999, (as amended), as well Article 2 of the African Charter on Human and People and Peoples Rights.

READ: Supreme Court keeps Buhari waiting on Section 84(12) of Electoral Act

The plaintiffs further contended that the constitution already makes provisions for qualification and disqualification for the offices of the President and Vice President, Governor and Deputy Governor, Senate and House of Representatives, House of Assembly, Ministers, Commissioners and Special Advisers.

They urged the Supreme Court to make: “A declaration that the joint and or combined reading of the section 65, 66, 106, 107, 131, 137, 147, 151, 177, 182, 192 and 196 of the constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999, (as amended), the provision of Section 84 (12) of the Electoral Act, 2022 which also ignores Section 84(3) of the same Act, is an additional qualifying and/or disqualifying factors for the National Assembly, House of Assembly, Gubernatorial and Presidential elections as enshrined in the said constitution, hence unconstitutional, unlawful, null and void”.

However, in its decision on Friday, the Supreme Court held that President Buhari having assented to the bill on February 25, 2022, cannot turn around to challenge the same Act.

In a unanimous judgment delivered by Justice Emmanuel Agim, the court said allowing the suit to have its way will amount to approbating and reprobating at the same time and no court of law shall allow that.

The Apex Court unanimously agreed that President Buhari lacked the jurisdiction to bring the suit before it because of the nature of the reliefs sought.

Facebook Comments
Advertisement
Comments