Court refuses plea to sack Cross River governor Ben Ayade, deputy

The Federal High Court sitting in Abuja, on Thursday, dismissed the suit filed by the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) seeking to declare the seat of Governor Ben Ayade of Cross River State and his deputy, Ivara Esu, vacant, following their defection to the ruling All Progressive Congress (APC).

Justice Taiwo Taiwo, who presided over the case, held that the duo could not be sacked from their positions, except through statutory procedures stipulated in sections 180, 188 and 189 of the 1999 Constitution, as amended.

It held that defection to another political party was not stated as one of the grounds for the removal of either a governor or his deputy.

“The 3rd and 4th Defendants cannot be removed except by Constitutional provision.

“This court has no power to declare vacant the seat of the 3rd and 4th Defendants,”, Justice Taiwo held.

PDP had in its suit marked FHC/ABJ/CS/975/2021, prayed the court to sack both Ayade and his deputy, contending that the duo, having abandoned the political party that sponsored their re-election, ought to vacate their respective offices.

READ: 17 Ebonyi lawmakers sacked alongside Umahi, deputy, to refund money

It had among other things, urged the court to declare that, “in view of the provisions of section 221 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended) and the democratic system of governance operated in Nigeria, votes at the election and elections are won by political parties and not their candidate or the candidates sponsored at the election by the political parties”.

It prayed the court to order the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), to immediately, “receive from the plaintiff (PDP), the name of its candidates to replace the 3rd and 4th defendants (Ayade and Esu) for the purpose of utilising the lawful votes cast in favour of the plaintiff or in the alternative directing the 1st defendant to hold a gubernatorial election for Cross River State in accordance with Section 177 of the Constitution, excluding the 3rd and 4th defendants who are disqualified from participating in the election by virtue of Section 192 (1) (b) of the Constitution) arising from abandonment of the majority lawful votes and the offices occasioned by the action of the 3rd and 4th defendants by reason of their becoming members of the 2nd defendant who did not win majority of the lawful votes cast at the election”.

Aside Ayade and his deputy, the INEC and APC were also cited as Defendants in the matter.